Philosophy 365 S
Political
Philosophy
Winter 2005
McLennan 118 Professor Gopal Sreenivasan
Wed
The following are available for purchase in the University Bookstore:
Skinner,
Course Reader.
In addition, four papers are available online as links from the
online syllabus. Note that these
readings are not included in the course reader.
Assignments
There will be three essays (2000 words) required in this
course. There will be no
examinations. The essays will each be
worth 33 percent of the final grade.
Tutorials
The lecture in this class will run from
(From my point of view:
there will be tutorial every week with [at most] half of you. From your point of view: you have the option of six tutorials, one
every other week).
Schedule
January 5 Introduction.
Jan 12
Jan 19 MacCallum, “Negative and positive freedom,” Philosophical Review 76 (1967): 312-34.
Jan 26 Skinner,
February 2 Pettit, Republicanism (Clarendon, 1997), chh. 1 and 2.
Equality
Feb 9 Williams, “The idea of equality,”
Problems of the Self (
First essay due.
Feb 16 Reading week.
Feb 23 Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 2nd ed. (Harvard, 1999), §§11-14 and 17.
March 2 Sen, “Equality of what?,” in S. Darwall (ed.) Equal
Freedom (
March 9 Parfit, Equality or Priority? in J. Harris (ed.) Bioethics (
Democracy
March 16 Dworkin, Freedom’s Law (Harvard, 1996), Introduction.
Second essay due.
March 23 Waldron, “A rights-based critique of constitutional rights,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13
(1993): 18-51;
Waldron, Law
and Disagreement (Clarendon, 1999), chh. 12-13.
March 30 Spector, “Judicial
Review, Rights, and Democracy,” Law
and Philosophy 22 (2003): 285-334.
April 6 Sreenivasan, “Does the GATS undermine democratic control over health?,” Journal of Ethics (2005):
269-81.
End
of lectures.
Third
essay due April 22.
Office
hours
Tuesdays 1-3. Room 921,
Late
penalties
Essays submitted after the due date will be penalised one increment of a grade (e.g., from B to B-). Essays submitted a week or more late will be penalised a further increment for each week late.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious academic offence. It comes in various forms, all of which carry grave penalties. If in doubt about what constitutes plagiarism, ask. You should consult the Philosophy Department’s statement on plagiarism.
Students agree that by taking this course all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. The terms that apply to the University’s use of the Turnitin.com service are described on the Turnitin.com web site.
Writing help
Help in writing is available from the Philosophy Department’s essay clinic. You are also encouraged to consult the Department’s guide to writing a philosophy essay.